<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sighting &#8211; LinkedIn Porn Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkedinpersonaltrainer.com/archives/new-sighting-linkedin-porn-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkedinpersonaltrainer.com/archives/new-sighting-linkedin-porn-spam/</link>
	<description>Using LinkedIn to find, get found, and network your way to success!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stylock</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedinpersonaltrainer.com/archives/new-sighting-linkedin-porn-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>stylock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkedinpersonaltrainer.com/?p=395#comment-127</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re too kind Joy;-)

But yes - it seems odd how ill advised and time consuming this would be.  The one thing that comes to mind with regular spam is that it is so inexpensive in time and effort.  Dealing with LinkedIn is time-consuming...

Thanks for commenting!

steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re too kind Joy;-)</p>
<p>But yes &#8211; it seems odd how ill advised and time consuming this would be.  The one thing that comes to mind with regular spam is that it is so inexpensive in time and effort.  Dealing with LinkedIn is time-consuming&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!</p>
<p>steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy Matkowski</title>
		<link>http://www.linkedinpersonaltrainer.com/archives/new-sighting-linkedin-porn-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy Matkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkedinpersonaltrainer.com/?p=395#comment-126</guid>
		<description>I had a similar LinkedIn invitation last week, but it was much better done. The picture was a young, sultry, but not conspicuously trashy female; the message was something bland like &quot;I&#039;d like to link&quot;; with the message was a URL with &quot;sex&quot; or something else pornie in it. I did an &quot;I don&#039;t know this user.&quot;

An oddity is that the large majority of people named Joy are female and therefore unlikely to be potential customers. Such stuff, if it requires work, ought to be sent to people named Steven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar LinkedIn invitation last week, but it was much better done. The picture was a young, sultry, but not conspicuously trashy female; the message was something bland like &#8220;I&#8217;d like to link&#8221;; with the message was a URL with &#8220;sex&#8221; or something else pornie in it. I did an &#8220;I don&#8217;t know this user.&#8221;</p>
<p>An oddity is that the large majority of people named Joy are female and therefore unlikely to be potential customers. Such stuff, if it requires work, ought to be sent to people named Steven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
